On 2018-Jul-03, Andres Freund wrote: > I'm not clear to why this is a problem? Seems like either behaviour can > be argued for. I don't really have an opinion either way. I'd just > remove the item from the open items list, I don't think we need to hold > up the release for it?
After reading this more carefully, isn't the problem that as soon as you get a slot into the 0/1 restart_lsn state, WAL recycling/deletion no longer happens? That does sound like a bad thing to me. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
