Em qui., 13 de jun. de 2024 às 12:25, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> escreveu:
> Ranier Vilela <ranier...@gmail.com> writes: > > I'm unsure if the documentation matches the code? > > " connect_timeout # > > < > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/libpq-connect.html#LIBPQ-CONNECT-CONNECT-TIMEOUT > > > > > Maximum time to wait while connecting, in seconds (write as a decimal > > integer, e.g., 10). Zero, negative, or not specified means wait > > indefinitely. The minimum allowed timeout is 2 seconds, therefore a value > > of 1 is interpreted as 2. This timeout applies separately to each host > name > > or IP address. For example, if you specify two hosts and connect_timeout > is > > 5, each host will time out if no connection is made within 5 seconds, so > > the total time spent waiting for a connection might be up to 10 seconds. > > " > > The comments says that timeout = 0, means *Timeout is immediate (no > > blocking)* > > > Does the word "indefinitely" mean infinite? > > If yes, connect_timeout = -1, mean infinite? > > The sentence about "minimum allowed timeout is 2 seconds" has to go > away, but the rest of that seems fine. > > But now that you mention it, we could drop the vestigial > > >> if (timeout < 0) > >> timeout = 0; > > as well, because the rest of the function only applies the timeout > when "timeout > 0". Otherwise end_time (nee finish_time) stays at -1. > I think that's OK Tom. +1 for push. best regards, Ranier Vilela