On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 01:00:00PM +0200, Michail Nikolaev wrote: > Probably something wrong with arbiter index selection for different > backends. I am afraid it could be a symptom of a more serious issue.
ON CONFLICT selects an index that may be rebuilt in parallel of the REINDEX happening, and its contents may be incomplete. Isn't the issue that we may select as arbiter indexes stuff that's !indisvalid? Using the ccnew or ccold indexes would not be correct for the conflict resolutions. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
