On Jun 15, 2024, at 10:27, Jeevan Chalke <jeevan.cha...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Sorry, I have missed this in the original patch. I am surprised how that > happened. But thanks for catching the same and fixing it. No worries. :-) > The changes are straightforward and look good to me. However, I have kept the > existing test of an empty array as is, assuming that it is one of the valid > tests. It now returns zero rows instead of an error. Your added test case > covers this issue. Makes sense, thank you. D
