On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 6:38 PM David E. Wheeler <da...@justatheory.com> wrote: > Is it? ISTM that there is the intention not to break things that don’t need > to be broken, though that doesn’t rule out interface improvements.
I suppose that it's true that we try to avoid gratuitous breakage, but I feel like it would be weird to document that. Sometimes I go to a store and I see a sign that says "shoplifters will be prosecuted." But I have yet to see a store with a sign that says "people who appear to be doing absolutely nothing wrong will not be prosecuted." If I did see such a sign, I would frankly be a little concerned. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
