On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 02:56:00PM -0300, Israel Barth Rubio wrote: > I've been playing a bit with the incremental backup feature which might > come as > part of the 17 release, and I think I hit a possible bug in the WAL > summarizer > process.
Thanks for testing new features and for this report! > FWIW, once I restart Postgres the WAL summarizer process gets back to normal > functioning. It seems to me there is some race condition between when a WAL > file > is removed and when `summarize_wal` is re-enabled, causing the process to > keep > looking for a WAL file that is the past. I am adding an open item to track this issue, to make sure that this is looked at. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
