Peter Eisentraut <pe...@eisentraut.org> writes:
> On 21.06.24 16:53, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Most of libpq gets at strerror_r via SOCK_STRERROR for Windows
>> portability. Is that relevant here?
> Looking inside the OpenSSL code, it makes no efforts to translate
> between winsock error codes and standard error codes, so I don't think
> our workaround/replacement code needs to do that either.
Fair enough.
> Btw., our source code comments say something like
> "ERR_reason_error_string randomly refuses to map system errno values."
> The reason it doesn't is exactly that it can't do it while maintaining
> thread-safety.
Ah. Do you want to improve that comment while you're at it?
regards, tom lane
