On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 5:30 PM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 11:55:03AM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 08:10:24AM +0200, Joel Jacobson wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2024, at 07:11, Michael Paquier wrote: > > >> v1 is fine without the "privileges list" part mentioned by Nathan in > > >> the first reply. > > > > > > v2 is exactly that, but renamed and attached, so we have an entry this > > > was the last version. > > > > LGTM > > Fine by me as well. I guess I'll just apply that once v18 opens up. > > Fine by me. We aren't consistent enough about all this to try and be authoritative. Though there was no comment on the fact we should be linking to: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Access-control_list not: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Access_Control_List to avoid the dis-ambiguation redirect. If we are making wikipedia our authority we might as well use their standard for naming. David J.
