On Mon, Jul 1, 2024, at 15:11, Joel Jacobson wrote: > Not really sure why. Maybe the code I tried can be optimized further:
If anyone want experiment with the int128 version, here is a patch that adds a separate numeric_mul_patched() function, so it's easier to benchmark against the unmodified numeric_mul(). /Joel
0001-Optimize-mul_var-for-var2ndigits-4.patch
Description: Binary data
