On Mon, Jul 08, 2024 at 10:17:49AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Heikki Linnakangas <hlinn...@iki.fi> writes: >> Note that until we actually add an injection point to a function that >> runs in the postmaster, there's no risk. If we're uneasy about that, we >> could add an assertion to InjectionPointRun() to prevent it from running >> in the postmaster, so that we don't cross that line inadvertently.
AFAIU, you want to be able to do that to enforce some protocol checks. That's a fine goal. > As long as we consider injection points to be a debug/test feature > only, I think it's a net positive that one can be set in the > postmaster. I'd be considerably more uncomfortable if somebody > wanted to do that in production, but maybe it'd be fine even then. This is documented as a developer feature for tests, the docs are clear about that. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
