Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote: > On 2024-Jul-09, Antonin Houska wrote: > > > Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote: > > > > > > Is your plan to work on it soon or should I try to write a draft patch? > > > > (I > > > > assume this is for PG >= 18.) > > > > > > I don't have plans for it, so if you have resources, please go for it. > > > > The first version is attached. The actual feature is in 0003. 0004 is > > probably > > not necessary now, but I haven't realized until I coded it. > > Thank you, this is great. I'll be studying this during the next > commitfest.
Thanks. I'll register it in the CF application. > BTW I can apply 0003 from this email perfectly fine, but you're right > that the archives don't show the file name. I suspect the > "Content-Disposition: inline" PLUS the Content-Type text/plain are what > cause the problem -- for instance, [1] doesn't have a problem and they > do have inline content disposition, but the content-type is not > text/plain. In any case, I encourage you not to send patches as > tarballs :-) > > [1] https://postgr.es/m/32781.1714378236@antos You're right, "Content-Disposition" is the problem. I forgot that "attachment" is better for patches and my email client (emacs+nmh) defaults to "inline". I'll pay attention next time. -- Antonin Houska Web: https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com
