Joe Conway <[email protected]> writes: > Fair enough, but then I think we should change the documentation to not > say "forever".
No objection to that, it's clearly a misleading definition.
regards, tom lane
- [18] Policy on IMMUTABLE functions and Unicode updates Jeff Davis
- Re: [18] Policy on IMMUTABLE functions and Unicode ... Joe Conway
- Re: [18] Policy on IMMUTABLE functions and Unic... David G. Johnston
- Re: [18] Policy on IMMUTABLE functions and ... Joe Conway
- Re: [18] Policy on IMMUTABLE functions ... Tom Lane
- Re: [18] Policy on IMMUTABLE funct... Joe Conway
- Re: [18] Policy on IMMUTABLE f... Tom Lane
- Re: [18] Policy on IMMUTABLE funct... David G. Johnston
- Re: [18] Policy on IMMUTABLE f... Jeremy Schneider
- Re: [18] Policy on IMMUTABLE f... Jeff Davis
- Re: [18] Policy on IMMUTABLE functions and Unicode ... Laurenz Albe
- Re: [18] Policy on IMMUTABLE functions and Unic... Jeff Davis
- Re: [18] Policy on IMMUTABLE functions and ... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [18] Policy on IMMUTABLE functions ... Robert Haas
- Re: [18] Policy on IMMUTABLE funct... Jeff Davis
- Re: [18] Policy on IMMUTABLE f... Noah Misch
- Re: [18] Policy on IMMUTAB... Jeff Davis
