On 09/07/18 18:57, Simon Riggs wrote:
On 9 July 2018 at 14:49, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinn...@iki.fi> wrote:
I'll mark this as "returned with feedback" in the commitfest. The way
forward is to test if we can get the same performance benefit from switching
to CMPXCHG16B, and keep the WAL format unchanged. If not, then we can
continue discussing the WAL format and the tradeoffs with xl_prev, but let's
take the easy way out if we can.
Agreed. Were you working on this? Or was anybody else?
Not me.
- Heikki
