On 08.07.24 23:27, Jacob Champion wrote:
On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 12:11 AM Peter Eisentraut <pe...@eisentraut.org> wrote:
This appears to imply that specifying ldapurl is only applicable for
search+bind. Maybe that whole message should be simplified to something
like
"configuration mixes arguments for simple bind and search+bind"
(The old wording also ignores that the error might arise via "ldapsuffix".)
I kept the imperative "cannot" and tried to match the terminology with
our documentation at [1]:
cannot mix options for simple bind and search+bind modes
Committed.
(I suppose this could be considered a bug fix, but I don't feel an
urgency to go backpatching this. Let me know if there are different
opinions.)
