On Tue, 2024-07-23 at 11:45 +0200, Marlene Reiterer wrote: > Am Mo., 22. Juli 2024 um 15:19 Uhr schrieb Wolfgang Walther > <walt...@technowledgy.de>: > > > > The order of json related aggregate functions in the docs is currently > > like this: > > > > [...] > > json_agg > > json_objectagg > > json_object_agg > > json_object_agg_strict > > json_object_agg_unique > > json_arrayagg > > json_object_agg_unique_strict > > max > > min > > range_agg > > range_intersect_agg > > json_agg_strict > > [...] > > > > json_arrayagg and json_agg_strict are out of place. > > > > Attached patch puts them in the right spot. This is the same down to v16. > > I compiled and it worked and didn't throw an error. > > The changes to the patch seem useful in my perspective, for making it > easier to find the functions in the documentation, so people will find > them easier. > > There is another table which isn't sorted too, the "Hypothetical-Set > Aggregate Functions". Which would be in need of an alphabetical > sorting too, if all the tables on this side > of the documentation should look alike.
There are only four hypothetical-set aggregate functions, so it is no problem to find a function in that list. I would say that it makes sense to apply the proposed patch, even if we don't sort that short list. Yours, Laurenz Albe
