Re: [17+] check after second call to pg_strnxfrm is too strict, relax it

[Jeff Davis]

On Tue, 2024-07-30 at 23:01 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> +1. A comment in the pg_strnxfrm() function itself would be good too.

Committed, thank you. Backported to 16 (original email said 17, but
that was a mistake).

Regards,
        Jeff Davis