On 11/08/2024 12:41, Pavel Stehule wrote:
ne 11. 8. 2024 v 9:23 odesílatel Ayush Vatsa <ayushvatsa1...@gmail.com <mailto:ayushvatsa1...@gmail.com>> napsal:

    Hi PostgreSQL Community,

    I have a scenario where I am working with two functions: one in SQL
    and another in C, where the SQL function is a wrapper around C
    function. Here’s an example:

    |CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION my_func(IN input text) RETURNS BIGINT AS
    $$ DECLARE result BIGINT; BEGIN SELECT col2 INTO result FROM
    my_func_extended(input); RETURN result; END; $$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
    CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION my_func_extended( IN input text, OUT col1
    text, OUT col2 BIGINT ) RETURNS SETOF record AS 'MODULE_PATHNAME',
    'my_func_extended' LANGUAGE C STRICT PARALLEL SAFE; |

    I need to prevent direct execution of |my_func_extended| from psql
    while still allowing it to be called from within the wrapper
    function |my_func|.

    I’m considering the following options:

     1. Using GRANT/REVOKE in SQL to manage permissions.
     2. Adding a check in the C function to allow execution only if
        |my_func| is in the call stack (previous parent or something),
        and otherwise throwing an error.

    Is there an existing approach to achieve this, or would you
    recommend a specific solution?

You can use fmgr hook, and hold some variable as gate if your function my_func_extended can be called

https://pgpedia.info/f/fmgr_hook.html <https://pgpedia.info/f/fmgr_hook.html>

With this option, the execution of my_func_extended will be faster, but all other execution will be little bit slower (due overhead of hook). But the code probably will be more simpler than processing callback stack.

plpgsql_check uses fmgr hook, and it is working well - just there can be some surprises, when the hook is activated in different order against function's execution, and then the FHET_END can be executed without related FHET_START.

Sounds complicated. I would go with the GRANT approach. Make my_func() a SECURITY DEFINER function, and revoke access to my_func_extended() for all other roles.

Another option to consider is to not expose my_func_extended() at the SQL level in the first place, and rewrite my_func() in C. Dunno how complicated the logic in my_func() is, if that makes sense.

--
Heikki Linnakangas
Neon (https://neon.tech)



Reply via email to