On Friday, August 16, 2024 2:49 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > -------------------- > > > > One more comment: > > > > 5) > > For insert/update_exists, the sequence is: > > Key .. ; existing local tuple .. ; remote tuple ... > > > > For rest of the conflicts, sequence is: > > Existing local tuple .. ; remote tuple .. ; replica identity .. > > > > Is it intentional? Shall the 'Key' or 'Replica Identity' be the first > > one to come in all conflicts? > > > > This is worth considering but Replica Identity signifies the old tuple values, > that is why it is probably kept at the end.
Right. I personally think the current position is ok. Best Regards, Hou zj
