On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 12:30 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > On 6/23/18 01:44, Nikita Glukhov wrote:
> >> We are simply trying first to convert numeric to int64 if is does not have
> >> digits after the decimal point, and then construct Python Int instead of
> >> Decimal. Standard Python json.loads() does the same for exact integers.
> > We just had a very similar but not identical discussion in the thread
> > about the PL/Perl transforms, where we rejected the proposal. Other
> > comments on this one?
> I can sympathize with the speed concern, but the proposed patch produces
> a functional change (ie, you get a different kind of Python object, with
> different behaviors, in some cases). That seems to me to be a good reason
> to reject it.
Nevertheless, as Nikita pointed, json.loads() performs the same in
Python. See an example for python 2.7.10.
>>> import json
So, from postgres point of view this behavior is wrong. But on
another hand why don't let python transform to behave like a python?
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company