On 2024-Sep-20, Tender Wang wrote: > jian he <jian.universal...@gmail.com> 于2024年9月20日周五 11:34写道: > > > another bug. > > I will dig later, just want to share it first. > > > > minimum producer: > > drop table if exists pp1,cc1, cc2,cc3; > > create table pp1 (f1 int ); > > create table cc1 () inherits (pp1); > > create table cc2() inherits(pp1,cc1); > > create table cc3() inherits(pp1,cc1,cc2); > > > > alter table pp1 alter f1 set not null; > > ERROR: tuple already updated by self > > I guess some place needs call CommandCounterIncrement().
Yeah ... this fixes it: diff --git a/src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c b/src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c index 579b8075b5..3f66e43b9a 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c @@ -7877,12 +7877,6 @@ ATExecSetNotNull(List **wqueue, Relation rel, char *conName, char *colName, { List *children; - /* - * Make previous addition visible, in case we process the same - * relation again while chasing down multiple inheritance trees. - */ - CommandCounterIncrement(); - children = find_inheritance_children(RelationGetRelid(rel), lockmode); @@ -7890,6 +7884,8 @@ ATExecSetNotNull(List **wqueue, Relation rel, char *conName, char *colName, { Relation childrel = table_open(childoid, NoLock); + CommandCounterIncrement(); + ATExecSetNotNull(wqueue, childrel, conName, colName, recurse, true, lockmode); table_close(childrel, NoLock); I was trying to save on the number of CCIs that we perform, but it's likely not a wise expenditure of time given that this isn't a very common scenario anyway. (Nobody with thousands of millions of children tables will try to run thousands of commands in a single transaction anyway ... so saving a few increments doesn't make any actual difference. If such people exist, they can show us their use case and we can investigate and fix it then.) -- Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ "This is what I like so much about PostgreSQL. Most of the surprises are of the "oh wow! That's cool" Not the "oh shit!" kind. :)" Scott Marlowe, http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-admin/2008-10/msg00152.php