I think that it would be a good idea to include these fixes in the next minor 
release. After working for a couple months on getting our embedded systems 2038 
compliant, it has become very apparent that 2038 will be a substantial ordeal. 
Maximizing the number of systems that include this fix would make things a 
little easier when that time comes around.

Thanks,

Max
________________________________
From: Nathan Bossart <nathandboss...@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2024 9:38 PM
To: Max Johnson <max.john...@novatechautomation.com>
Cc: pgsql-hack...@postgresql.org <pgsql-hack...@postgresql.org>; 
t...@sss.pgh.pa.us <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Subject: Re: pg_ctl/miscinit: print "MyStartTime" as a long long instead of 
long to avoid 2038 problem.

On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 08:04:59PM +0000, Max Johnson wrote:
> I think your patch looks good, no objections. I am happy to have contributed.

Great.  I've attached what I have staged for commit.

My first instinct was to not bother back-patching this since all
currently-supported versions will have been out of support for over 8 years
by the time this becomes a practical issue.  However, I wonder if it makes
sense to back-patch for the kinds of 32-bit embedded systems you cited
upthread.  I can imagine that such systems might need to work for a very
long time without any software updates, in which case it'd probably be a
good idea to make this fix available in the next minor release.  What do
you think?

--
nathan

Reply via email to