> I'm wondering if we can use the wording maxerror as in the attached > patch. >
+ <varlistentry> + <term><literal>REJECT_LIMIT</literal></term> + <listitem> + <para> + Specifies the maximum number of errors tolerated while converting a + column's input value to its data type, when <literal>ON_ERROR</literal> is + set to <literal>ignore</literal>. + If the input causes more errors than the specified value, the <command>COPY</command> + command fails, even with <literal>ON_ERROR</literal> set to <literal>ignore</literal>. + This clause must be used with <literal>ON_ERROR</literal>=<literal>ignore</literal> + and <replaceable class="parameter">maxerror</replaceable> must be positive. + If not specified, <literal>ON_ERROR</literal>=<literal>ignore</literal> + allows an unlimited number of errors, meaning <command>COPY</command> will + skip all erroneous data. + </para> + </listitem> + </varlistentry> mentioning <replaceable class="parameter">maxerror</replaceable> is a bigint type or explicitly mentioning the maximum allowed value of "maxerror" would be great. other than that, it looks good to me.
