Hello,
postgres=# select partkey, partc[TAB]
> [no completions]
>
>From the thread, I believe that this feature will be implemented in a after
patch.
>
> And I'd love this case, where go back to edit the SELECT list, after
> already typing the FROM part, to be smarter:
>
> postgres=# select p[TAB] FROM lp;
> Display all 370 possibilities? (y or n)
>
I believe this would be a very interesting feature indeed.
After playing alittle bit around with the patch I noticed that a comma was
missing in line 1214
+ 1202 /* min_server_version */
+ 1203 90000,
+ 1204 /* catname */
+ 1205 "pg_catalog.pg_proc p",
+ 1206 /* selcondition */
+ 1207 "p.prorettype NOT IN ('trigger'::regtype,
'internal'::regtype) "
+ 1208 "AND 'internal'::regtype != ALL (p.proargtypes) "
+ 1209 "AND p.oid NOT IN (SELECT
unnest(array[typinput,typoutput,typreceive,typsend,typmodin,typmodout,typanalyze])
FROM pg_type) "
+ 1210 "AND p.oid NOT IN (SELECT
unnest(array[aggtransfn,aggfinalfn]) FROM pg_aggregate) "
+ 1211 "AND p.oid NOT IN (SELECT
unnest(array[oprcode,oprrest,oprjoin]) FROM pg_operator) "
+ 1212 "AND p.oid NOT IN (SELECT
unnest(array[lanplcallfoid,laninline,lanvalidator]) FROM pg_language) "
+ 1213 "AND p.oid NOT IN (SELECT castfunc FROM pg_cast) "
+ 1214 "AND p.oid NOT IN (SELECT amproc FROM pg_amproc) "
+ 1215 /* viscondition */
+ 1216 "pg_catalog.pg_function_is_visible(p.oid)",
To catch these typos would be good if we could get some testing around
psql.
(Newbie question: do we have any kind of testing around tools like psql?)
Thanks
Joao
