On 16 July 2018 at 06:55, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > I started to look at this patch. I think this is basically the right > direction to go in, but I'm not terribly happy with the details of the > data structure design.
I've made an attempt at addressing the issues that I understood. I've not done anything about your Bitmapset for non-matching partitions. I fail to see how that would improve the code. But please feel free to provide details of your design and I'll review it and let you know what I think about it. -- David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
v2-0001-Fix-run-time-partition-pruning-for-UNION-ALL-pare.patch
Description: Binary data
