On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 5:15 PM Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote:
> I am not a fan of this patch. I don't see why _removing_ the magnetic > part helps because you then have no logic for any 1.2 was chosen. Okay, but we have no documented logic on why 4.0 was chosen either. :) I would put the magnetic in a separate paragraph perhaps, and recommend > 4.0 for it. Sounds doable. Even in the pre-SSD age I recall lowering this as a fairly standard practice, but I'm fine with a recommendation of 4. Partly because I doubt anyone will use it much. Also, per-tablespace makes sense because of physical media > differences, but what purpose would per-database and per-role serve? > Also, per-tablespace is not a connection-activated item like the other > two. > Good point, I withdraw that part. Cheers, Greg
