Hi, > I can accept this outcome though an optional three-valued boolean sort order > (ascending and descending only) I'd argue is worth keeping. null value > placement too I guess, three-valued boolean (nulls_first).
Perhaps these optional arguments deserve separate discussions. I suggest merging something everyone agrees on first. This will simplify the review process and allow us to deliver value to the users quickly. Arguments like `reverse => true` and `nulls_first => true` can always be implemented and added as separate patches. -- Best regards, Aleksander Alekseev
