On Fri, 25 Oct 2024 at 09:51, Andrei Lepikhov <lepi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It may be have made sense to lock the row of replaced index in pg_class > and pg_index until the transaction, altered it will be commmitted. But, > because ALTER TABLE is not fully MVCC-safe, it may be expected (or > acceptable) behaviour.
I suspect this is the case. If that is, should be reflect it in the doc? -- Best regards, Kirill Reshke
