On 2024-Oct-25, Tom Lane wrote: > As I recall, we looked at adopting it some years ago and decided it > was too much churn for the value (seeing that the long-term plan is > to go to meson only). Maybe C23 is a reason to rethink, but from > what I recall of that, it won't be a painless update.
Ah, yeah. That was 2.71 actually: https://postgr.es/m/3838336.1657985...@sss.pgh.pa.us 1.72 seems to have been released with some fixes from that one. Per that thread, the related problem you noticed was with m4, and apparently it was because macOS ships a version from 2006 (1.4.7). Here on Debian bookworm I have m4 1.4.19; maybe macOS has updated its copy now? -- Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
