On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 7:51 AM Heikki Linnakangas <hlinn...@iki.fi> wrote: > Or keep using "protocol extension" and add a paragraph to the docs to > say explicitly that there's no support for extensions to create protocol > extensions. TLS extensions is a good comparison.
Of the three proposed, this last one is my preference. I think it'd be good to draw very clear lines between the transport level, the protocol level, and the application level. Thanks, --Jacob