Hi! On Fri, 25 Oct 2024 at 17:01, Andrey M. Borodin <x4...@yandex-team.ru> wrote: > > > > > On 25 Oct 2024, at 00:55, Rahila Syed <rahilasye...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > While writing this email, I realized I evicted buffers for the table > > and not the index. I will perform the test again. However, > > I would like to know your opinion on whether this looks like > > a valid test. > > Well, yes, kind of, you need drop caches from index. And, perhaps, you can > have more indexes. You also can disable autovaccum and just restart postgres > instead of iterating through buffer caches. > > I've asked Thomas about performance implications and he told me that > converting stuff to streamlined API is not expected to have better > performance. It's needed to have decent perfromance when DIRECT_IO will be > involved. > > Thanks! > > > Best regards, Andrey Borodin. >
I noticed CI failure for this patch. This does not look like a flap. [0] https://cirrus-ci.com/task/4527545259917312 [1] https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/4527545259917312/log/src/test/modules/test_misc/tmp_check/log/regress_log_007_vacuum_btree -- Best regards, Kirill Reshke
