Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rash...@gmail.com> writes: > On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 at 08:43, Andy Fan <zhihuifan1...@163.com> wrote: >> >> Thanks for the detailed feedback! Here is the rebased version. >> > > I took another look at this and I think it's in reasonable shape. > > I'm attaching an update, rebasing it on top of 9be4e5d293.
Thank you Dean. > Also it was missing a required update to the meson.build file -- > that's the immediate cause of the other cfbot failures. OK, great to know this one, I should have paid more attention to cfbot. > The rest is just cosmetic tidying up, fixing indentation, tweaking > comments, and the like. I also hacked on the docs a bit -- the > synopsis only listed one of the new function signatures for some > reason. After fixing that, I think it's sufficient to just list one > usage example. That looks better now, more concise and expressive sentences. -- Best Regards Andy Fan
