Hi, On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 06:49:04PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 08:52:04AM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote: > > Yeah, but not only the relfilenode ones. All kinds were affected as random > > data > > was in the padding bytes for all of them. > > A quick test where I add some padding junk in PgStat_HashKey proves > that you are right.
Thanks for the testing! > I'm wondering if we should backpatch that, > actually, down to where it has been introduced. We are unlikely going > to change this structure, Yeah. > but if we do for the sake of a bug fix, > which is always a possibility as ABI does not matter much for this > internal structure, that's potentially trouble waiting ahead. That's right. > Thoughts? hm, yeah I think that it could fall into the "low-risk fixes" category [0] and that we can opt for backpatch. [0]: https://www.postgresql.org/support/versioning/ Regards, -- Bertrand Drouvot PostgreSQL Contributors Team RDS Open Source Databases Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
