On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 07:54:03PM -0500, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 7:48 PM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: >> 691e8b2e18 is not something I would have done when it comes to >> pageinspect, FWIW. There is the superuser argument for this module, >> so I'd vote for an error and apply the same policy across all branches >> as a matter of consistency. > > 691e8b2e18 was the one that threw the error?
Oops. Sorry about that. I meant c788115b5eb5 in this sentence, not 691e8b2e18. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
