On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 12:15:25PM +0530, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> Yes that's right. Thanks for taking care of it.

Okay, I have pushed a fix for this one as that's wrong and
back-patched to v11.  The coverage of reparameterize_path_by_child is
actually quite poor if you look at the reports:
https://coverage.postgresql.org/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c.gcov.html

Could it be possible to stress that more?  This way mistakes like this
one could have been avoided from the start.
--
Michael

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to