Richard Guo <guofengli...@gmail.com> writes:
> I've applied some of the changes you suggested in your previous email
> and pushed the updated patch.  Thank you for your review.

The buildfarm's not too happy.  It looks like this patch decided
to use the name "distinct_tbl" in a test script that runs in
parallel with another one already using "distinct_tbl".

                        regards, tom lane


Reply via email to