On 14/07/18 00:56, Robert Haas wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 2:22 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinn...@iki.fi> wrote:
I just bumped into this comment, from commit 09529a70bb5, and I can't make
sense of it:
+ /*
+ * We reach here if the index only scan is not parallel,
or if we're
+ * executing a index only scan that was intended to be
parallel
+ * serially.
+ */
What was that intended to say?
There are two ways that you can reach that code. One is that you have
the thing that shows up in EXPLAIN output as "Index-Only Scan". The
other is that you have the thing that shows up in EXPLAIN output as
"Parallel Index-Only Scan", but you didn't get any workers, so now
you're falling back to running what was intended to be a parallel plan
without parallelism i.e. serially. The comment is intended to alert
you to the fact that an intended-as-parallel scan can end up here in
corner cases where the plan doesn't end up being parallel. We've had
some difficulty in consistently getting that case correct.
Ah, gotcha. I changed that (and the other copies) per David's suggestion.
- Heikki
