On Fri, 29 Nov 2024 at 20:20, Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 11:23:12AM +0500, Kirill Reshke wrote: > > If we don’t have the relation OID when writing buffers out, can we > > just store oid to buffertag mapping somewhere and use it? > > Do you mean add the relation OID into the BufferTag? While that could probably > be done from a technical point of view (with probably non negligible amount > of refactoring), I can see those cons:
Not exactly, what i had in mind was a separate hashmap into shared memory, mapping buffertag<>oid. > 2. Probably lot of refactoring > 3. This new member would be there "only" for stats and reporting purpose as > it is not needed at all for buffer related operations To this design, your points 2&3 apply. -- Best regards, Kirill Reshke
