> On 29 Nov 2024, at 18:57, Sergey Prokhorenko <sergeyprokhore...@yahoo.com.au>
> wrote:
>
> Workloads can and must be added with parameters. Typically, companies use
> test tables of 10,000 and 1,000,000 records, etc. Different companies have
> mostly similar usage scenarios (for example, incremental loading). Each
> company has to duplicate the work of others, creating the same benchmarks.
> The worst thing is that this is entrusted to incompetent employees who are
> not very good at understanding typical key usage scenarios. As a rule, these
> are programmers, not system analysts. Accordingly, the solution in 99% of
> cases will be in favor of integer keys, as they take up less space and are
> generated faster. If we leave this problem until the next patch, it will take
> us a year and a half. This is completely wrong.
I think we have pretty decent documentation in the patch. It only points to RFC
and that's it.
There were patch versions with opinionated novels in docs. Giving advises,
comparing possibilities and all that stuff. I'm so happy we passed through this
stage and moved forward :)
Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
