Hi, On 2018-07-18 16:08:37 +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote: > Anyway, I have no clear idea what changes would be necessary to the original > design of logical decoding to make implementing this easier now. The > decoding in general is quite constrained by how our transam and WAL stuff > works. I suppose Andres thought about this aspect, and I guess he concluded > that (a) it's not needed for v1, and (b) adding it later will require about > the same effort. So in the "better" case we'd end up waiting for logical > decoding much longer, in the worse case we would not have it at all.
I still don't really see an alternative that'd have been (or even *is*) realistically doable. Greetings, Andres Freund
