On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 02:04:15PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 12:41:37PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 11:43:02AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > >> I don't think this patch is doing anything I want at all. > > > > > Gee, I kind of liked the patch, but maybe you didn't like the additional > > > complexity to check the PDF output twice, once on input (complex) and > > > once on output. The attached patch only does the output check. > > > > It's still not doing anything I want at all. I'm with Tatsuo > > on this: I do not want the makefiles deciding for me which > > warnings are acceptable. > > Okay, how about the attached patch that just prints the message at the > bottom, with no error. We could do this for all warnings, but I think > there are some we expect.
Patch applied. I added a mention of README.non-ASCII. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com When a patient asks the doctor, "Am I going to die?", he means "Am I going to die soon?"
