Hi, On 2018-07-20 07:49:11 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 01:02:35PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > > So, I have been playing with the previous patch and tortured it through > > a couple of upgrade scenarios, where it proves to work. Attached is an > > updated patch which adds toast tables except for pg_class, pg_attribute, > > pg_index and pg_largeobject* with a proposal of commit message. Any > > objections for the commit of this stuff? > > Committed.
FWIW, I was off the last few days. I personally think the reasoning to leave out pg_class, pg_index etc. is bad. We should just make them work and create toast tables as well. It's definitely not right that "those relations have no reason to use a toast table anyway." as the commit message states, given relacl, reloptions and relpartbound. Greetings, Andres Freund
