On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 at 08:28, Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote:

> I would suggest to split the patch into two pieces for clarity, based
> on the fact that your v7 patch is doing more than one thing at the
> same time:
> - Introduce new tests for the new coverage (domain, CREATE TABLE OF,
> ALTER TABLE flavors) in a first patch.
> - Introduce the ParseStates in these new code paths in a second patch.
>
> By structuring things this way, it is possible to see what kind of
> difference related to the new ParseStates is introduced, based on the
> new test coverage introduced in the first patch.
>
> This makes also the whole review easier.

Ok. Sure.

> Typo here: s/exists/exist/.

Fixed, Thank you


PFA v8.

-- 
Best regards,
Kirill Reshke

Attachment: v8-0001-Add-more-regression-tests-to-various-DDL-patterns.patch
Description: Binary data

Attachment: v8-0002-Print-out-error-position-for-number-of-DDL-comman.patch
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to