On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 7:14 PM Melanie Plageman <melanieplage...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 2:18 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I agree that it will be unimportant from Melanie's work in this area. > > Also, I agree that if semi-aggressive vacuum has its own new logging > > message about what it's done, this new message doesn't necessarily > > need to be detailed. But looking at the proposed patches, there seems > > to be no such new logging message so far. Showing three categories > > makes sense to me independent of semi-aggressive vacuum work. If we > > figure out it's better to merge some parts of this new message to > > semi-aggressive vacuum's logs, we can adjust them later. > > Yes, actually after some review feedback on the eager vacuum patch set > from Andres, I switched my approach and these counters are no longer a > dependency. (I still require the second patch in this set). > > However, through this discussion, I've come to think that the VM > logging is useful. As such I plan to commit attached v5 (which > addresses review feedback and incorporates Tomas' wording suggestion).
I've committed this and marked the commitfest entry as committed as well. Thanks everyone for your review and input. - Melanie
