On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 8:01 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandboss...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 02:48:10PM +0100, Frédéric Yhuel wrote: > > For what it's worth, although I would have preferred the sub-linear > growth > > thing, I'd much rather have this than nothing. > > +1, this is how I feel, too. But I also don't want to add something that > folks won't find useful. > > > And I have to admit that the proposed formulas were either too > convoluted or > > wrong. > > > > This very patch is more straightforward. Please let me know if I can help > > and how. > > I read through the thread from the top, and it does seem like there is > reasonably strong support for the hard cap. Upon a closer review of the > patch, I noticed that the relopt was defined such that you couldn't disable > autovacuum_max_threshold on a per-table basis, so I fixed that in v4. > > -- > nathan > nathan, Please also provide the tests on the new parameter you want to introduce. Best, vini
