On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 1:21 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote: > > On 2025-Jan-13, Melanie Plageman wrote: > > > I've gone with VACUUM_AUTOVACUUM, VACUUM_COST_DELAY, and > > VACUUM_FREEZING, but I am open to feedback. > > Looks good to me. I checked these two queries, whose results appear > correct: > > 55432 18devel 560655=# select name, category from pg_settings where category > ilike '%vacuum%'; > name │ category > ───────────────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────────────── > autovacuum │ Vacuuming / Automatic Vacuuming > autovacuum_analyze_scale_factor │ Vacuuming / Automatic Vacuuming > autovacuum_analyze_threshold │ Vacuuming / Automatic Vacuuming > autovacuum_freeze_max_age │ Vacuuming / Automatic Vacuuming > autovacuum_max_workers │ Vacuuming / Automatic Vacuuming > autovacuum_multixact_freeze_max_age │ Vacuuming / Automatic Vacuuming > autovacuum_naptime │ Vacuuming / Automatic Vacuuming > autovacuum_vacuum_cost_delay │ Vacuuming / Automatic Vacuuming > autovacuum_vacuum_cost_limit │ Vacuuming / Automatic Vacuuming > autovacuum_vacuum_insert_scale_factor │ Vacuuming / Automatic Vacuuming > autovacuum_vacuum_insert_threshold │ Vacuuming / Automatic Vacuuming > autovacuum_vacuum_scale_factor │ Vacuuming / Automatic Vacuuming > autovacuum_vacuum_threshold │ Vacuuming / Automatic Vacuuming > autovacuum_worker_slots │ Vacuuming / Automatic Vacuuming > vacuum_cost_delay │ Vacuuming / Cost-Based Vacuum Delay > vacuum_cost_limit │ Vacuuming / Cost-Based Vacuum Delay > vacuum_cost_page_dirty │ Vacuuming / Cost-Based Vacuum Delay > vacuum_cost_page_hit │ Vacuuming / Cost-Based Vacuum Delay > vacuum_cost_page_miss │ Vacuuming / Cost-Based Vacuum Delay > vacuum_failsafe_age │ Vacuuming / Freezing > vacuum_freeze_min_age │ Vacuuming / Freezing > vacuum_freeze_table_age │ Vacuuming / Freezing > vacuum_multixact_failsafe_age │ Vacuuming / Freezing > vacuum_multixact_freeze_min_age │ Vacuuming / Freezing > vacuum_multixact_freeze_table_age │ Vacuuming / Freezing > > > 55432 18devel 560655=# select name, category from pg_settings where > (short_desc ilike '%vacuum%' or extra_desc ilike '%vacuum%') and category not > ilike '%vacuum%'; > name │ category > ─────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────────────── > autovacuum_work_mem │ Resource Usage / Memory > log_autovacuum_min_duration │ Reporting and Logging / What to Log > maintenance_work_mem │ Resource Usage / Memory > vacuum_buffer_usage_limit │ Resource Usage / Memory
Yea, Alena also mentioned these GUCs that are in different groups. I think it is okay for these four to remain in their current locations as their current groupings seem descriptive enough. - Melanie
