On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 3:45 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbal...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 3, 2025 at 4:31 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jan 2, 2025 at 2:57 PM vignesh C <vignes...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > Conflict detection of truncated updates is detected as update_missing >> > and deleted update is detected as update_deleted. I was not sure if >> > truncated updates should also be detected as update_deleted, as the >> > document says truncate operation is "It has the same effect as an >> > unqualified DELETE on each table" at [1]. >> > >> >> This is expected behavior because TRUNCATE would immediately reclaim >> space and remove all the data. So, there is no way to retain the >> removed row. > > > I’m not sure whether to call this expected behavior or simply acknowledge > that we have no way to control it. Logically, it would have been preferable > if it behaved like a DELETE, but we are constrained by the way TRUNCATE works. >
I see your point. So, it is probably better to add a Note about this. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
