Jacob Champion <[email protected]> writes:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 11:35 AM Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Maybe we could add this to the existing src/test/ssl/ tests,
>> which already deal with that hazard?
> That seems okay in the short term. (But it certainly highlights our
> lack of a "PG_TEST_EXTRA=loopback-is-fine" mode...)
Part of my thought here is that these functions are not worth their
very own TAP test, with all the overhead that implies of firing up
a new database instance. So I was looking for something we could
fold them into. I agree the SSL tests are focused on something
else, but still...
regards, tom lane
