On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 13:30:17 +0100 Laurenz Albe <laurenz.a...@cybertec.at> wrote:
> On Fri, 2024-09-13 at 16:18 +0900, Yugo Nagata wrote: > > I've attached a updated patch. The test is rewritten using > > has_largeobject_privilege() > > function instead of calling loread & lowrite, which makes the test a bit > > simpler. > > Thare are no other changes. > > When I tried to apply this patch, I found that it doesn't apply any > more since commit f391d9dc93 renamed tab-complete.c to tab-complete.in.c. > > Attached is a rebased patch. Thank you for updating the patch! > I agree that large objects are a feature that should fade out (alas, > the JDBC driver still uses it for BLOBs). But this patch is not big > or complicated and is unlikely to create a big maintenance burden. > > So I am somewhat for committing it. It works as advertised. > If you are fine with my rebased patch, I can mark it as "ready for > committer". If it actually gets committed depends on whether there > is a committer who thinks it worth the effort or not. I confirmed the patch and I am fine with it. Regards, Yugo Nagata -- Yugo NAGATA <nag...@sraoss.co.jp>
