On Monday, February 10, 2025 8:03 PM Nisha Moond <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 8, 2025 at 12:28 PM Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > 3. > > > > + if (cause & RS_INVAL_HORIZON) > > + { > > + if (!SlotIsLogical(s)) > > + goto invalidation_marked; > > > > I am not sure if this logic is correct. Even if the slot would not be > > invalidated due to RS_INVAL_HORIZON, we should continue to check other > causes. > > > > Used goto here since we do not expect RS_INVAL_HORIZON to be combined > with any other "cause" and to keep the pgHead behavior. > However, with the bitflag approach, the code should be future-safe, so > replacing goto in v73 should handle this now.
I think the following logic needs some adjustments.
+ if (invalidation_cause == RS_INVAL_NONE &&
+ (possible_causes & RS_INVAL_HORIZON))
+ {
+ if (SlotIsLogical(s) &&
+ /* invalid DB oid signals a shared relation */
+ (dboid == InvalidOid || dboid ==
s->data.database) &&
+
TransactionIdIsValid(initial_effective_xmin) &&
+
TransactionIdPrecedesOrEquals(initial_effective_xmin,
+
snapshotConflictHorizon))
+ invalidation_cause = RS_INVAL_HORIZON;
+ else if
(TransactionIdIsValid(initial_catalog_effective_xmin) &&
+
TransactionIdPrecedesOrEquals(initial_catalog_effective_xmin,
+
snapshotConflictHorizon))
+ invalidation_cause = RS_INVAL_HORIZON;
+ }
I think we assign RS_INVAL_HORIZON to invalidation_cause only when the slot is
logical and the dboid is valid, but it is not guaranteed in the second if
condition ("else if (TransactionIdIsValid(initial_catalog_effective_xmin)").
Here is a top-up patch to fix this.
Best Regards,
Hou zj
0001-fix-if-condition.patch
Description: 0001-fix-if-condition.patch
