On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 2:18 PM Ilia Evdokimov <ilya.evdoki...@tantorlabs.com> wrote: > With such example, it's hard to disagree with it. This would really add > valuable information. Taking all opinions into account, I have updated > the patch v8. I have also included a check for the case where there are > only zeros after the decimal point. We do not want to clutter the rows > with unnecessary zeros.
I disagree. We don't do this for any other fractional value we print in any other part of the system, and I do not think this case should be some kind of weird exception. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
